![Previous](images/arrows_contents1.bmp) ![Previous](images/arrows_back.bmp) ![Home](images/arrows_home.bmp) ![Next](images/arrows_right.bmp) ![](images/cloze_blank.jpg) ![](images/cloze.bmp) ![](images/cloze_blank.jpg) ![](images/WD.png)
The Revolution of 1905
|
NOTE: this
topic is a stated topic on the AQA specification only. It is NOT a topic on the Edexcel
specification.
|
What was 1905?
Historians are all agreed that 1905 was significant, but disgaree about in what way it was significant
– for example:
• Benard Pares (1939) thought it gave hope for the survival of the monarchy: “the monarchy had been saved; the economy was prosperous; and Russia had...
half a constitution”.
• Abraham Ascher (1988) thought the revolution
reflected deep-seated social and economic issues; the Tsar's concessions were
tactical, to buy time, rather than addressing the causes.
• Stephen Lee (2006) saw 1905 as the logical outcome
of reforms made by the Tsars, and actually as the start of a gradual return to
uncompromising repression.
• Sheila Fitzpatrick (2008) thought the outcome: “ambiguous, and unsatisfactory to all concerned”.
It did not produce satisfactory reforms, did not create a clear working-class
unity, and actually showed that the Army was still prepared and able to put down
uncoordinated uprisings.
• John Morison (2014) believed that 1905 was a
genuine revolution, the point in time when ordinary Russians became political
aware.
As you study this webpage, be thinking: what do YOU make of it?
This webpage deals with four issues:
-
The Causes of the 1905 Revolution;
-
The Events of the 1905 Revolution;
-
The Outcomes of the 1905 Revolution;
-
The situation in 1913.
.
|
Going Deeper
The following links will help you widen your knowledge:
Basic accounts from BBC Bitesize on the causes and events
International School History - excellent
In what ways were the lives of Russians affected by the 1905 Revolution?
YouTube
1905 revolution - detailed narrative account
Causes of the 1905 revolution
The Dumas
- narrative account
How did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution - suggests two reasons
Myths & Reality
- a very one-sided revisionist view of Nicholas II
|
1. Coronation catastrophe
Tsar Nicholas’ coronation was held on 26 May 1896. A celebration was planned on the Khodynka army training field, and people were promised a goody bag, including a spice-bread and a commemorative mug, both with Nicholas’ monogram on them … distributed from tables set up next to a ditch.
400,000 people gathered and, when a rumour went round that the gifts were being
distributed, there was a surge … and a crush; 1,282 people died.
Nicholas noted the “disgusting impression” left by the news on “this sad national holiday” … but still went ahead with the evening’s ball.
Although the victims’ families were compensated financially, he gained a
reputation – which was to return again and again – of not caring about his
people.
|
![](images/Russ2.1.jpg)
The coronation of Nicholas, 1896. It was a bad omen when the Cross of St Andrew fell from his cloak.
|
2. Universal unrest: riots, strikes and terrorism
You have studied the background, and know that Russia was in
violent ferment in 1904 … to the point where historians disagree about what was
the starting date of the ‘1905’ revolution.
The main sources of unrest were [SPIN]:
a. Student anger
In 1899, there were student demonstrations
in protest at government repression and control over the curriculum;
as a result, in 1901, 183 students of Kiev University were conscripted
into the Army, and many others were expelled and exiled.
The assassinated government ministers – 1901:
Bogolepov (Minister of Education) by Pyotr Karpovich; 1902: Sipyagin
(Minister of the Interior) by Stepan Balmashov; 1904: Plehve (Director
of Police) – were all killed by men who had taken part in the student
protests of 1899-1903, and who had joined the SRCO.
b. Peasant anger
In 1902-3 peasants in Ukraine and European
Russia rebelled, drove out the landlords & burned their homes, and the
army was needed to suppress the uprisings.
In July 1902 the Agrarian Socialist League,
together with the Socialist Revolutionaries, held a Conference at
which it resolved to promote peasant terrorism.
In 1902 the Socialist Revolutionary Party was founded; many peasants supported its policy of land-socialisation (ownership of all land by the community).
The SR’s key method was assassination of government officials, and it
had a specific Combat Organisation (SRCO) for that very task.
1903-5 became known as the 'Years of the Red
Cockerel' as peasants drove out the nobles and burned down their
houses.
c. Industrial workers anger
In 1896-7 a successful textile workers
strike in St Petersburg spread to other cities.
A
financial crisis in 1899 and the economic recession which followed it created more unrest. The government increased taxes to help industry. At the
same time the industrialists cut wages and increased hours. In
1903 there were industrial strikes and riots in the iron mills of the
Urals, the oil fields of Baku, and a general strike throughout Ukraine
and south Russia, with a further huge strike in Baku in 1904.
In 1895-1904, 1,765 strikes involving 431,000
workers were officially recorded.
In 1904, a strike at the Putilov railway and
armaments factory in St Petersburg caused a general strike in the
city; by 21 January
the city had no electricity.
d. Nationalist anger
Nicholas pursued a policy of ‘Russification’ – extending Russian control over
the Empire.
-
During Nicholas II’s reign, the Black Hundreds was formed, an extreme nationalist movement that attacked
dissident groups and organised pogroms aganst Jews living within the Empire. The Russian system of education was imposed
in the Baltic states.
-
In Feb 1899 Nicholas issued his Manifesto for
Finland, declaring that Imperial Decrees overruled local laws; this
led to a general refusal to pay taxes, and in 1904 a Finnish
nationalist, Eugen Schauman, assassinated Nikolay Bobrikov, the Russan
Governor.
In 1903, the government transferred Armenia’s national fund to Russian control, leading the Armenian Revolutionary Federation to organise demonstrations and terrorist attacks. The young lawyer who defended the ARF leaders when they were put on
trial in 1912 was Alexander Kerensky.
|
|
3. Political aspirations
The ‘Liberals’ included many members of the intelligentsia and
bourgeois middle class:
A Union of Zemstvo Constitutionalists had
been set up by some progressive landlords in 1903; it asked the Tsar
for “popular representation”.
A Union of Liberation was set up in 1904, which
demanded a constitutional monarchy, democracy, and self-determination
for the different nationalities (such as the Poles) that lived in the
Russian Empire.
Through 1904, the Union of Liberation organised a
series of banquets – a cover for protest meetings; it was this
campaign which resulted in the Conference of Zemstva and the Tsar’s
December 1904 Manifesto.
|
Did You Know
Note that many textbooks also list the ‘Social Democrats’ (followers of Karl Marx). Founded in 1898, the group was, however, small, its leaders in prison or in exile, and in 1903 it quarrelled and split into the moderate Mensheviks (wanted Communism without a revolution) and the extremist Bolsheviks (wanted a violent proletarian revolution). It
only became significant after the 1905 revolution.
|
4. Inadequate reforms
Some of Nicholas’s actions seem downright repressive:
In 1895, informed that the zemstva wanted a
greater say in government, told them they were “senseless dreams”.
-
In 1897, the police were given the power to
imprison without trial "determined leaders" of strikes in times of
unrest. In 1899, tax-collectors were told to exercise
"unceasing coercion" The Tsar increasingly used the military to suppress strikes and peasant protests
The Tsar was suspected of condoning the anti-Jewish pogroms of 1903
The Okhrana infiltrated political groups and set
up Okhrana-run ‘Zubatov’ trade unions – sometimes this backfired: an
Okhrana double-agent organised the Odessa strikes of 1903; another
ordered the murder of Plehve in 1904; and the priest Father Georgy
Gapon worked with the Okhrana to set up the Assembly of Russian
Factory and Mill Workers in St Petersburg.
However, it was not so much that Nicholas refused reform;
his leading Minister Sergei Witte (1892-1906) genuinely tried to introduce
progressive reforms:
In 1896, to celebrate his coronation,
Nicholas declared an amnesty for tax arrears, and halved land tax rates for a decade
In 1897, a law imposed a maximum of 11½ hours’ work for day workers and 10 hours for night work
(poorly enforced)
-
In 1900, the number of factory inspectors was
increased to 257 (for 18,000 factories) and regulations were
introduced which prevented local governors from interfering, and
allowed Inspectorate reports to be published. They still,
however, had few powers of enforcement.
-
In 1903, pensions were provided for workers
injured at work, and regulations issued requiring workers to be paid
in money, limiting fines, and encouraging employers to give proper
contracts (largely ignored). In Feb 1903, an Imperial Manifesto abolished villages’ joint responsibility for non-payment of taxes
In March 1903 an edict gave religious freedom throughout the empire, and promised village communities more say in local government
In Sept 1904, to celebrate Alexei’s baptism, all arrears on redemption payments were forgiven, and corporal punishment of peasants
was forbidden In December 1904, after a
National Conference of Zemstva, Nicholas issued a Manifesto promising
the zemstva more powers, insurance for industrial workers, civil
rights for non-Russians, and the abolition of censorship; but he did
NOT promise a national zemstvo.
What annoyed people was that these reforms only came
after riots & strikes, and did not go as far as people wanted. |
|
5. Defeat by Japan
In 1894-5 Japan defeated China, and occupied
Manchuria, but Russia, Britain, France and Germany forced Japan to
give it up. In 1897 Russia
occupied the Leaodong Peninsula, and built Port Arthur as a warm-water
port for the Russian Pacific Fleet.
In 1900, Russia took advantage of the Boxer Rebellion in China and seized all of Manchuria; this angered Japan, but Russian diplomats treated the Japanese with contempt
Japan won the Russo-Japanese War, 1904-5 (why?):
In February 1904: Japan made a
surprise torpedo attack which destroyed the Russian Pacific Fleet,
and then declared war.
The Japanese Army captured Port Arthur (5 January 1905) and destroyed the Russian Army at Mukden (March 1905)
Russian sent its Baltic Fleet to China, but it was destroyed by the Japanese Navy at Tsushima (May 1905)
The United States mediated a peace (Treaty of Portsmouth, Sept 1905); it was a humiliation for Russia.
Japan gained the island of Sakhalin and Port Arthur, plus control
over Korea; Russia had to withdraw from Manchuria.
Consider:
1. I have analysed the underlying causes of the 1905 Revolution into five
causes [CUPID]. The AQA syllabus suggests a different list: • the inefficient and corrupt government; • conditions of the peasants; • the activities of opposition groups;
• the contrast between rich and poor.
Taking the facts and ideas from this webpage, plan a four-paragraph essay: ‘What
caused the 1905 Revolution’ ... using the AQA headings.
2. When would YOU say the 1905 ‘revolution’ started?
|
Did You Know
In 1898 Nicholas issued a Rescript for Peace, proposing a disarmament conference at the Hague.
The Conference set up a Court of Arbitration still used today, but failed to
defuse international tensions.
Nicholas was considered naive, and it did not help that one of the Court’s first decisions was to make Russia pay reparations when a Russian warship accidentally sunk some British trawlers (thinking they were the Japanese navy).
|
1. Bloody Sunday
On Sunday 22 January Father Gapon led a huge Assembly of Russian Factory and Mill Workers procession to the Tsar’s Winter Place to ask for a constitutional assembly. It was peaceful, and many carried religious icons and images of the royal family. As the crowd failed to disperse when ordered, troops opened fire.
The official police report recorded 75 killed, historians suggest perhaps 200,
rumours at the time claimed 1,000.
The whole country rose. The Tsar’s uncle was assassinated. There were nationalist demonstrations in Poland & Finland, and mass strikes in the towns. Workers' Councils ('Soviets') were set up in St Petersburg (January), Moscow
(May) and many other towwns. There were more than 3,000 ‘Red Cockerel’ uprisings across the country.
The sailors on the battleship Potemkin mutinied (June), killed their officers,
bombarded Odessa and fled to Roumania.
|
|
2. August Manifesto
In February, Nicholas promised reforms and asked for suggestions. The trouble subsided. 60,000 peasant petitions poured in. The Liberals formed the Union of Unions to co-ordinate their response.
In August, Nicholas promised to call a Duma, but it would have a restricted
electorate and no powers.
It was not enough. There was another wave of protests. A Railway strike paralysed the country and stopped the supply of food to the towns. On 26 October,
St Petersburg Soviet (worker’s committee) held its first formal meeting; by
November it had 562 deputies.
|
|
3. October Manifesto
On 30 October
1905, therefore, the Tsar issued the October Manifesto, which promised “freedom
based on the principles of real personal inviolability, freedom of conscience,
speech, assembly and union” and a Duma which would be elected by universal
suffrage, have the power to veto laws, and “actual participation” in the
government of the country.
He also promised to abolish redemption payments (this happened
in 1907).
|
|
1. Dumas
The 1905 revolution DID give Russia a kind of parliament, albeit a very weak one, with the right to criticise. This was key to the Tsar's survival in 1905, because it removed the
'constitutionalists' – the zemstvo nobles, bourgeois and intelligentsia (e.g.
the 'Octobrists' and the Kadets) from the revolution.
a. The Tsar overturned the constitutional changes:
In February 1906, The Tsar upgraded his State Council (an
advisory body) to a Second Chamber with the power of veto.
Next, on 6 May
1906, just before the First Duma met, he issued
the 'Fundamental Laws', giving the Tsar a veto of any decisions, the right to dissolve the Duma, and the right to make laws when it was not in session. The Tsar kept full control of the administration, foreign policy and the army.
The Duma was forbidden to discuss financial matters … basically, the Tsar had
reneged on his October Manifesto.
There was no renewed revolution, however – the Tsar had
survived with his powers more or less intact.
b. There were FOUR Dumas, 1906-17:
The first Duma (May 1906) was dominated by the Kadets. They demanded the dismissal of the State Council, abolition of capital punishment, universal suffrage, amnesty of political prisoners, and the seizure of private land in the countryside.
Nicholas dismissed it in July 1905, and troops occupied the chamber and
closed down the Duma.
The second Duma (February 1907) was dominated by the Social Revolutionaries,
who again demanded the nationalisation of land. The delegates opposed everything – eve a motion that “terrorism is incompatible with parliamentary institutions”. It was dismissed in June 1907 when it refused to expel the Social Democrats
who had been trying to organise a coup, and a new Electoral Law changed the voting system
to exclude opponents of the state.
(Lenin called this: 'Stolypin's coup') The third Duma (November 1907) was dominated by the Octobrists and the URP - it lasted its full term to 1912. Until his assassination in 1911, Stolypin worked with the Duma (not always amicably – Bernard Pares commented that he was the only one of the
Tsar’s ministers who could shout down the Duma).
The fourth Duma was also full of the Tsar's supporters, though many turned
against him during the First World War – the Duma lasted until 1917, but the
Tsar and his ministers simply ignored it.
c. The Duma became a weak-but-functioning
Parliament:
Although it might seem that the 1905 Revolution had been
defeated, even the weakened Duma gradually developed proper parliamentary
procedures, and proper political parties, which took the leading role in
February 1917.
A ‘Union of Russian People’ Party (URP) who wanted to
return to autocracy;
The concessions proved acceptable to the conservative liberals, who formed the
'Union of October 17' party (the ‘Octobrists’); A Constitutionalist Democratic Party (the ‘Kadets’);
-
Although the Social Democrats refused to take part
in the elections for the First Duma, especially the 'Mensheviks'
participated in the 3rd and 4th Dumas;
-
Although the Social Revolutionaries boycotted every
Duma apart from the Second, they DID return to support the Provisional
Government in 1917.
|
Source A
The workers and peasants had shown that they could create havoc, but their actions had been too haphazard to be effective, once the government had succeeded in dividing its opponents with the publication of the October Manifesto.
Anthony Wood, The Russian Revolution (1979).
Explanation of political parties in Russia by Louise Bryant, an American journalist (1918)
|
2. The ministry of Stolypin
In April 1906, Pyotr Stolypin took over as Nicholas's Prime
Minister. He was dynamic, and got things done. He believed in the monarchy, but also believed that the
government needed to gain people's support through reforms and representation.
His policy can be summed up in his saying: 'Wager on the strong' = "he
recognised that unless the masses in Russia were transformed into full citizens
who participated in the political process, the fires of revolution would not be
put out” (Ascher, 2000).
a. Repression: the givernment crushed the Revolution
The concessions of 1905 had FAILED to stop the violence. Oct 1905-Oct 1906 a total of 3,611 government officials of all ranks were killed (17,000 by 1916). However, the concessions
had broken the revolutionary unity, so unrest could be countered on a piecemeal basis by a severe repression. In December 1905 the St Petersburg Soviet was arrested en masse. An armed uprising led by
the Moscow Soviet in December 1905 was brutally crushed.
Stolypin intensified this repression:
military tribunals were set up to try and (if found guilty) execute people
on the same day. From 1906 the
Okhrana began a policy of ‘provocation’ – illegally infiltrating its sotrudniki (agents) to help terrorist organisations whilst betraying them. 1,400 people were executed in 1906; the noose became known as
‘Stolypin’s necktie’ and Lenin called Stolypin “the arch-hangman”. By the
end of 1907 Poland, Finland and two thirds of Russia were under martial law.
The Black Hundreds intimidated and attacked the Tsar's opponents.
b. Agrarian Reforms
In
November 1906 Stolypin abolished communal ownership of land; the mirs had to allow
individual peasants to consoldiate their strips and buy the land; this created a
small class of wealthier, ‘middle-class’ farmers (the ‘kulaks’) whom he hoped
would support the government … plus, it reduced
the mirs’ ability to resist the government.
Peasants were encouraged to move to Siberia; 21
million hectares of government land was offered for sale, and settlers were
given advice, grants, and loans from the Peasant Land Bank.
In 1907, Redemption payments were abolished.
Peasants were offered agricultural advice and education, and the Peasants
Land Bank gave loans to hwlp them buy their farms and form cooperatives.
c. Other Reforms
Stolypin introduced a number of other reforms, including army & navy reforms.
In 1908 the government committed to universal
Primary education & had set up 50,000
new primary schools by 1914, and teachers got a large pay rise.
-
Trade Unions had been legalised in 1905.
The government improved health & accident insurance for workers, and
introduced (in 1912) factory safety inspectors.
He encouraged local government, created of
Justices of the Peace, and in 1911 introduced zemstva into the western areas of the Empire (including
Poland).
|
Source B
The key to the regime's survival, of corse, was its use of repression and ultimatey the loyalty of the army – the opposition could not
match the weaponry and organisation of the army as the Moscow uprising demonstrated.
Graham Darby, The Russian Revolution (1998).
![](images/Russ2_Khutor.jpg)
An idealised 1884 painting by Russian artist Konstantin Kryzhitsky of a Khutor – a single-homestead farm, such as Stolypin envisaged for the kulaks.
|
a. The country was thriving
Agricultural production grew by 14% 1908-12, and in
1912 Russia exported more wheat than Canada and America combined.
In the more stable political situation, foreign investment poured
into Russia. Heavy industry grew especially quickly, and in 1914 Russia was the fourth largest producer of steel, coal and iron.
b. The monarchy was saved
Show trials and summary executions had reduced
membership of revolutionary groups from 100,000 to 10,000 by 1910.
The 1913 Tercentenary celebrations were a great
success. After a week-long celebration in St Petersburg, followed by a tour
of the towns of Muscovy, and another huge celebration in Moscow, Nicholas exulted: "My people love me", and the Tsarina wrote: "their hearts
are ours" (although the historian Orlando Figes suggests they were
deluded). Nevertheless, the British Foriegn Office reported: "'nothing could exceed the affection and devotion to the person of the Emperor displayed by the population wherever His Majesty appeared. There is no doubt that in this strong attachment of the masses ... lies the great strength of the Russian autocracy".
c. The peasants had benefited
There was resistance to Stolypin's Land reform in
the mirs, and Encycopaedia Britannica's judgement is gloomy: "The reform was only a moderate success. By the end of 1916 no more than 20% of the peasant households had title to their land,
[and] fewer (some 10%) had received consolidated plots... The reform did
not transform the peasantry into the bulwark of support that the autocracy
needed; and during 1917 peasants everywhere participated in the revolutions,
seizing properties belonging to the Stolypin farmers".
HOWEVER: The anarchy in the countryside
had ceased, living standards in the countryside were rising, 2 million families
had benefited from Peasant Land Bank loans, and 2.8
million migrants had relocated to Siberia 1908-13 – staggering figures.
d. The workers were discontented
Wages had fallen behind inflation, were less than a
third of the average in Western Europe, and the social security benefits
for sickness and injury only covered a small proportion of the workforce.
Per capita income in Russia was a tenth of that in the USA.
Trade Union militancy had been repressed by Stolypin, but a massacre by
troops of protesting miners at the Lena Goldfields in 1912 unleashed a wave
of strikes and protests, including a general strike in St Petersburg in
1914, which was supported by the students, and which involved barricades and
street-fighting.
e. The political classes were quiet ... for
now
Stolypin's repression had forced the political classes
to decide whether they were going to work with, or against, the state ... and
most of them (even the Menshviks) had decided they would. The Duma
was developing proper precedures,and there was generl outrage when the Duma
members were asked to sit at the back of the tercentenary celebrations (and they
were moved).
Terrorists and Bolsheviks had been sent to Siberia, or forced into exile or
hiding, and the Soviets were suppressed. However the idea did not go away. The defeated Moscow Soviet announced: "We are ending our struggle…. All the people are looking at us
– some with horror, others with deep sympathy. Blood, violence and death will follow in our footsteps. But it does not matter. The working class will win."
|
Source C
[In 1905] Russia got a new constitution... A new,
elected parliament, the Duma, was established, and political parties (such
as the Octobrists) and trade unions were legalized.
Although the government was still not responsible to the
Duma, this reform seemed only a matter of time, and the foundation seemed to
have been laid for a responsible and liberal opposition.
Industry was booming, and the government of Petr Stolypin (prime minister 1906-11) made some reforms to remove the causes of peasant discontent.
Hutchinson Encyclopaedia (2000).
|
Interpretations of Stolypin
Soviet historians hated Stolypin as the
‘uber-lyncher’, and presented him as a repressive manipulator concerned only
to uphold the old system.
The émigré historians praised him as a progressive liberal, who had successfully thwarted the revolutionaries.
One – FM Goriachkin (1928) – called him “the first Russian fascist” (he
meant it as praise).
-
Bernard Pares, who knew Stolypin, wrote of him in 1939
as wam, noble and inspirational - the man "who restored order to the country
... Stolypin was not what is called a great man; he had evident limitations, of intellect rather than understanding; though not really unscrupulous, he found his way to the political objects which he had set himself by simple energy and directness". Historians in modern Russia have praised him as a man who made Russia strong: in 2000 President Putin declared that his two priorities were Stolypin’s priorities – political and economic stability.
A poll in Russia in 2008 named Stolypin as the second-greatest Russian.
The recent biographer Abraham Ascher (2001) found
him a complex, principled man – “an authoritarian reformer”.
|
On Stolypin:
• BBC Bitesize
• Land Reform
• Overview
• Comment on his counter-insurgency
|
Consider:
1. Using Sources A-C and your own knowledge, explain
how the Tsar survived the 1905 Revolution.
2. Collect from this webpage all the
information you can about Stolypin. Explain
which of the four historiographical interpretations seems to you most
accurate.
|
- AQA-style Questions
4. Describe two problems
facing the Tsar in 1905.
5. In what ways were the lives of people affected by Stolypin’s policies?
6. Which of the following was the more important cause of the
1905 Revolution:
• economic unrest • political
disaffection?
|
![Previous](images/arrows_contents1.bmp) ![Previous](images/arrows_back.bmp) ![Home](images/arrows_home.bmp) ![Next](images/arrows_right.bmp) ![](images/cloze_blank.jpg)
|